IOC Practice:

Criterion A - For criterion A I would get a 5 because i feel as though my comments showed that I understood what was going on in the text but looking back i=on it I forgot to include information about the doctor who also had a part in the text and i did a comparison between Malcolm and Macbeth, who was not in the passage, and i am not sure if we are allowed to do that. I thought my references were decent but upon reflection I feel as though I used to few and did not vary them enough I also think I could have gone into more detail on explaining why they were important. 

Criterion B - For criterion B I would give myself a 4. After listening back to what I said I think I give a good range of different literary elements that are used to show the theme I was targeting but i forgot to give give examples of what their impact is on the reader. I think I did a pretty good job of using them to construct meaning within my thesis. 

Criterion C - For Criterion C I would give myself a 4. I feel like I did a good job organizing my thoughts. I went from one point to the next and attempted to connect it back to the original theme that I stated at the beginning. I had an intro about the text, my thesis, 3 points I analyzed using literary elements, and then a conclusion. 

Criterion D - For criterion D I would give myself a 3. I think that the terms I used were appropriate but i am sure there are some elements or literary terms that I could have used and did not. Overall though I think that the comments and structure that I used for the commentary was appropriate for what I was trying to say.